The Washington Times website apparently has a feature called UPI Hears…
Today’s includes a brief story on a former Bush Admin official questioning the 9/11 story.
A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11. Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush’s first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is “bogus” and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7.
WHAT?! Simple question, where are the planes and the people on them? What about the calls from those people on United Flight 93? What explains the Pentagon? What is he suggesting?
1) The Government planned to demo the buildings anyway and they set off the already installed explosives after terrorists conveniently flew planes into the buildings.
2) The Government planned to demo the buildings anyway and somehow managed to install explosives after the terrorists conveniently flew planes into the buildings.
3) There were no planes and the government made the whole thing up to explain an early explosion from pre-installed explosives.
4) The government co-ordinated the 9/11 attacks.
Every one of these is ridiculous on the face of it. Tell me that your run-of-the-mill explosives expert wouldn’t flip on the conspiracy and spill the story after seeing the affect it had on the nation.
I just don’t understand this at all. What sequence of events, other than what we saw happen, explains any of this better than the current 9/11 narrative?