Archive for the ‘politics’ Category

They’re slowly awakening…

Monday, May 23rd, 2005

Please check out this article in yesterday’s San Francisco Chronicle. No really, trust me. I know it’s San Francisco. I know. But you’ll thank me for it. It’s called “Leaving the Left: I can no longer abide the simpering voices of self-styled progressives — people who once championed solidarity.”

Choice quotes include:

“This past January, my liberalism was in full throttle when I bid the cultural left goodbye to escape a new version of that oppressiveness. I departed with new clarity about the brilliance of liberal democracy and the value system it entails; the quest for freedom as an intrinsically human affair; and the dangers of demands for conformity and adherence to any point of view through silence, fear, or coercion. “

“A left averse to making common cause with competent, self- determining individuals — people who guide their lives on the basis of received values, everyday moral understandings, traditional wisdom, and plain common sense — is a faction that deserves the marginalization it has pursued with such tenacity for so many years. “

And, dear God, this one:

“These days the postmodern left demands that government and private institutions guarantee equality of outcomes. Any racial or gender “disparities” are to be considered evidence of culpable bias, regardless of factors such as personal motivation, training, and skill. This goal is neither liberal nor progressive; but it is what the left has chosen. In a very real sense it may be the last card held by a movement increasingly ensnared in resentful questing for group-specific rights and the subordination of citizenship to group identity. There’s a word for this: pathetic. “

Quick Post Monday MediaCritique

Monday, May 23rd, 2005

It seems that President Bush’s string of election victories, begun with the Afghani elections, continues in Germany, if John Fund at WSJ Opinionjournal is correct. I wonder if the rest of Europe is paying attention.

I was listening to Laura Ingraham on the drive to work this morning, as is my wont, and she was talking to Howard Fineman, Deputy Washington, D.C. Bureau Chief for Newsweek, regarding the Kuran Kurfuffle and he made an interesting comment about Michael Isikoff, the writer of the brief piece in question and the man inexplicably charged with cleaning up the mess with the able help of Evan Thomas.

Please forgive what paraphrasing may exist as I don’t have a transcript, and I am relying on my increasingly faulty reporter’s memory.

“I can assure you that Mike has no idealogical agenda other than making life difficult for whoever is in power,” Howard Fineman, Laura Ingraham 5/23/05 radio program.

While Fineman admitted that a blind-spot exists in the MSM coverage of the military because few reporters have any experience or acquaintances with experience in the military, but here he reveals a blind-spot about the role and duty of journalism [hmm... a bit of a non-sequitor there, but I'll leave it -ed.] He doesn’t seem to understand that the role of the journalist is not, or rather shouldn’t be, “speaking truth to power;” it is, or should be, reporting the facts, in appropriate context, in a timely and newsworthy manner. By “newsworthy,” I mean that some stories, while true and extant, don’t merit publication because they are so common as to be assumed or are simply unnecessary gadfly-ism. “Making life difficult for those in power” falls into the latter category. Not every story is Watergate and not every war is Viet Nam. The inimitable James Taranto ably describes such adversarial journalism here, here, here and the follies it brings here.

If your entire ideology consists of antagonizing those in power (a common pasttime when those in power are Republicans), then you can’t help but introduce bias by your story selection, article tone and editorial review. If all Isikoff wants to do is make the Administration in power squirm, he is going to be a little quick on the trigger to fire off a story from a trusted but anonymous source with an axe to grind against those in power. This is how stories like the Texas Air National Guard memos and the Koran flushing, the leaked Election Day raw exit poll data and the “missing” Iraqi weapons stores (and where did that story go, I wonder?) got released too early and came back to bite the reporters in the ass.

Patience, circumspection and accuracy should be the motto of any reputable news organization, not “You heard it here first!” and “Late-Breaking Exclusive!”

So much for a quick note. This has been your Monday MediaCritique… as good a choice for recurring Monday category as any I suppose.

It’s what time?

Thursday, May 5th, 2005

Why am I blogging when I should be sleeping? I blame Callimachus over at Done With Mirrors. He started blogging just a little before I did, and is doing a much better job of it let me tell you. He’s one of those bloggers who I instantly realized would do me a world of good to read regularly. I added him to my feed list and let Feedreader accumulate yummy political, etymological and comedy goodness. Tonight, I noticed his series on Wilson and Wilsonians (1,2,3,4, 5) and I admit I was intrigued, but I was actually sidetracked into reading his posts on Iraq and Viet Nam. He is a former liberal, but not quite a conservative (and as an etymologist, he rightly points out that those labels are nearly devoid of meaning, or at least are no longer useful for describing or comparing anything. Callimachus is also managing editor at a small-town newspaper near Lancaster or Reading, PA (which, by sheer coincidence, I will be visiting on behalf of work for 5 days next week-end). His job gives him access to the wire services allowing him to post entries like this one comparing the wire services’ photo coverage of the Syrian pullout of Lebanon.

At any rate, I just wanted to point out a member of my blogroll that I have been aware of for a long time, but never really got to know. Well, now I did and you should too (not that I seem to have any readers in my new home yet).

Good Luck Tony!

Wednesday, May 4th, 2005

As indicated in this post, I feel that America owes Tony Blair a great debt for his unwavering support of our efforts in Iraq.
Good luck to Tony Blair tomorrow as he stands for an unprecedented third consecutive term as Labour Prime Minister. It’s almost certain that he will win, but you never know.